MODEL FOR EVALUATION OF
STUDENT WRITING
|
|
UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
SUPERIOR/EXCELLENT |
|
A.
CONTENT: |
The
thesis is lacking or is only implied, confused, or not supported with
appropriate detail. The writing is thin, with few concrete examples or
illustrations to support the generalizations. |
Thesis
is apparent but perhaps too general or commonplace. It is supported with some
proof, but it may be sketchy or occasionally irrelevant. The content may be
thin, although some generalizations may be supported with examples. |
It
has a significant thesis, clearly defined and supported with substantial and
relevant information. The essay includes a wealth of relevant details,
examples, or imagery |
|
B.
ORGANIZATION: |
The
plan and purpose of the essay are not apparent. It is not developed or is
developed with some irrelevancy or redundancy. The paragraphs are incoherent
or undeveloped. Transitions are weak or lacking. |
The
plan of development is apparent but not consistently followed. The writing
lacks clarity or is repetitious. The paragraphs are generally effective, but
transitions may be weak or mechanical. |
It
is planned logically and progresses in clearly ordered and necessary steps.
It is developed with originality and attention to proportion and emphasis.
The paragraphs are logically and effectively developed. The transitions
between paragraphs are effective. |
|
C.
DICTION AND MECHANICS: |
Often,
sentences are not grammatically correct. The vocabulary is elementary, not
college level. Words are used incorrectly. There are persistent usage,
spelling, or punctuation problems. |
The
sentences are correctly constructed but lack distinction, creativity, or
style. Words are generally used correctly, and the vocabulary is adequate. There
may be some lapses in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. |
The
sentences are skillfully constructed, effective, and varied. Words used are
vivid, accurate, and original. The writing is without serious flaws in
grammar or mechanics. A personal style is evident. |
|
D.
RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION: |
Sources
are lacking or inappropriate. Information from sources is not adequately
incorporated into the body of the essay. Documentation is missing,
inadequate, or contains major errors. |
Sources
used are too general, lacking in authority, or occasionally irrelevant.
Information is occasionally incorporated without introductory phrases or is
weakly connected to the content of the essay. In-text citations and
References or Works Cited page are generally correct, but may contain some
minor errors. |
Sources
used are relevant, substantial, and authoritative. Information is introduced
and incorporated smoothly and appropriately. Documentation is clear, correct,
and adequate. |
For
each category, A through D, essays will receive a score from 1-10.
|
Category score: |
Rating: |
|
0-5 |
Unsatisfactory |
|
6-8 |
Satisfactory |
|
9-10 |
Superior/Excellent |
Category
scores are added to generate a final score and rating, as follows:
|
Total score: |
Rating: |
|
0-23 |
Unsatisfactory |
|
24-35 |
Satisfactory |
|
36-40 |
Superior/Excellent |
Note: In order to be rated as Satisfactory, essays must receive a score of 6 or higher in each of the four categories.