Perspectives on the Individual—Core 2007
Dr. Jonathan Alexander
jalexander@bcc.edu
(please use my BCC e-mail account)
Phone: 609-894-9311 x1123
Online Syllabus: http://staff.bcc.edu/faculty_websites/jalexand/2007syl.htm
REVISED FOR FALL 2011
Seven required texts:
1) Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale
2) Gilgamesh
3) Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents
4) The Autobiography of Malcolm X
5) Plato, Apology and Crito
6) Elie Wiesel, Night
7) FDU University Core Readings (Ed., James Kuehl)
The Core Reading text above includes the following
selections:
Thich Nhat Hanh,
“Thây’s Fourteen Precepts”
Anne Fausto-Sterling, “The Five Sexes”
Sharon Begley, Decoding the Human Body
Geoffrey Cowley and Anne Underwood, A Revolution in Medicine
Adam Bryant, The Gold Rush
Robert Sapolsky, It’s Not “All in the Genes”
The Sermon on the Mount
Pico della Mirandola,
“Oration on the Dignity of Man”
William Wordsworth, “Ode: Intimations of Immortality…” and “Tintern
Abbey”
Tillie Olsen, “I Stand Here Ironing”
NOTE: Phone the campus bookstore BEFORE
you go to ensure that the books are available.
Overview: Within the Western World we traditionally begin with the
self in antithetical relationship to all others. In “Perspectives on the
Individual” we begin by reading Plato’s “Crito” and
“Apology,” wherein we explore the development of the individual as dissenting
thinker. We move next to Gilgamesh and a discussion of the cultural
emergence of the individual and socialization. In Margaret Atwood’s The
Handmaid’s Tale, we see depicted a society of the future in which the
individual is no longer valued as such. With selections from Pico della Mirandola’s “Oration on the
Dignity of Man” we are introduced to Renaissance understandings of the value of
the individual while Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey” and
“Ode: Imitations of Immorality” serve as a Romantic focus on the theme of
turning inward. The course nears its end with the Autobiography of Malcolm X
and deals with such topics as the lifelong search for self and the
transformation of the self through catharsis. We turn to Tillie Olsen’s “I
Stand Here Ironing” as we try to deal with the question of how the structure of
society may culturally repress the individuality of women or allow it to grow.
We move to Freud and the struggle between instinctual drives and the
expectations of civilization and we conclude with Elie
Wiesel’s Night, a depiction of the Holocaust and the struggle of
humanity against its own worst enemy.
Course Expectations: ~ If the student is to profit from any course, he or she
must attend class on a consistent basis. Students must attend all classes for
the full duration of each session. Entering late or leaving early is considered
disrespectful and will not be tolerated. Should you need to miss a class for
observance of religious holidays, jury duty, military duty, bereavement, or
illness, you must notify the instructor by telephone or e-mail either prior
to or within 24 hours after the class. Without this communication, students
forfeit the right to make up missed work.
Communication: Generally, e-mail is a convenient method of
exchanging information between student and faculty; however, because of occasional
problems with transmission, students who do not receive a reply to their
e-mail within 48 hours should assume it was never received and should resend
e-mail or call the office. This is especially important regarding e-mails
which document absences or which contain submitted assignments. (If you find it
necessary to submit an assignment via e-mail attachment, please do so using
Microsoft Word® only; do not attach documents created using Works® or
WordPerfect®. Only attach assignments if they have a DOC or TXT extension.)
Written Work: Written work as a rule should utilize standard rules
of grammar, sentence organization, paragraph organization, and diction. All
papers are to be typed, double spaced, stapled, and carefully proofread.
See each assignment page online for particular information and specifications
for the assignments.
Assignment Deadlines: All assignments are due on the date specified on the
syllabus without exception. Assignments which are not submitted during
the class session they are due will be penalized 15% for each subsequent day
they are late. On the occasion when a student is absent the day an assignment
is due, he or she should submit the assignment as an attachment via e-mail the same day it is due.
Considering that students know all assignments and deadlines from the first day
of the semester, excuses such as “crashed computers,” “misplaced data,”
“misplaced disks,” or “empty printer ink cartridges” will not be accepted. It
is suggested that all computer work be saved twice (once on your personal
computer’s hard drive and again on a removable floppy disk).
Plagiarism: Plagiarism will not be tolerated under any
circumstances. Be aware of the six kinds of plagiarism:
The penalty for plagiarism is failure of the
assignment and/or the course and may result in expulsion from the University.
See Purdue University’s site for skills in Avoiding
Plagiarism.
|
Grades
will be based on the following equivalents: |
|
|
Points
Earned |
Final Grade |
|
92-100 |
A |
|
89-91 |
A- (note the lower average needed) |
|
87-88 |
B+ |
|
83-86 |
B |
|
81-82 |
B- |
|
79-80 |
C+ (note the higher average needed) |
|
75-78 |
C |
|
70-74 |
D |
|
0-69 |
F |
Course Assignments:
Journals, Participation, and other assigned activities (20 pts): Journal responses will be checked randomly through
the semester and evaluated during the last session of the course. Students are
expected to answer at least half of all focus questions provided for
each reading on the syllabus. For online sessions, all posted questions must be
answered completely and specific deadlines must be met.
Papers (40 pts): Two formal papers will be due on sessions 7 and 14.
Each paper must be 1000 words, typed, double-spaced. These papers should focus
on an expansion or elaboration of previously discussed materials. The focus of
each paper should be connections made among readings.
Midterm Exam (20 pts—session 8) and Final
Exam (20 pts—session 15): There will
be a midterm examination covering the first half of the course material and a
final examination that will cover only the second half of the material. Both
exams may be a combination of objective and short essay questions.
Schedule of Assigned Readings and Focus
Questions: All reading must be
completed by the date they are listed below. For days which we meet in
class, responses to focus questions should be brought to class for discussion.
CLASS SCHEDULE: This
course includes 15 class sessions (Mondays and Wednesdays, 6-8:30pm).
Some class sessions will be comprised of e-mail responses as illustrated below.
BRIEF COURSE MEETING SCHEDULE
|
|
|
MONDAYS |
WEDNESDAYS |
|
10-31,
Course introduction |
11-2, NO MEETING |
|
11-7, Plato, Apology
and Crito (continued) |
11-9, NO MEETING, Gilgamesh |
|
11-14, Sermon and “Thây’s Fourteen Precepts” |
11-16, NO MEETING, Atwood’s
Handmaid’s Tale |
|
11-21, Pico della Mirandola and ESSAY
ONE |
11-23,
NO CLASS (THANGSGIVING) |
|
11-28, MIDTERM EXAM |
11-30, NO MEETING, Genetics
(selections) |
|
12-5, Wordsworth, “Ode” and
“Tintern Abbey” |
12-7, NO MEETING, Malcolm
X (selections) |
|
12-12, Olsen, “I Stand Here
Ironing” |
12-14, NO MEETING, Freud’s Civilization |
|
12-19, Wiesel, Night
and ESSAY TWO |
12-21, FINAL EXAM |
DETAILED SCHEDULE OF READINGS AND FOCUS
QUESTIONS:
SESSION ONE—MONDAY, 10-31
Course Introduction
SESSION TWO— ONLINE, WEEK OF WEDNESDAY,
11-2
Student
Survey—Click to view survey questions. Respond to each question and e-mail responses to me before noon on
Sunday, November 6, 2011
SESSION THREE—MONDAY, 11-7
Readings: Plato, Apology and Crito
Focusing Questions: (1) Socrates claims that “An unexamined life is
not worth living.” What exactly is an “examined life”? How is examining one’s
life related to being an individual in our culture? Is living an examined life
always desirable? Is it possible to examine everything about our lives? Do you
accept Plato’s suggestion that the more heroic individual is the reflective,
independent thinker rather than the warrior? (2) What role does reasoning play
in freeing us from the domination of traditional myths and social demands? What
is the community’s or society’s interest in controlling dissent? (3) Socrates
claims that his sole “wisdom” consists in the realization that he is not wise. What
does he mean? Is his behavior during his trial and imprisonment consistent with
this claim? (4) It is sometimes argued that Socrates committed a form of
suicide. In what sense, if any, is this true?
SESSION FOUR—ONLINE, WEEK OF WEDNESDAY,
11-9
Readings: Gilgamesh
Focusing Questions: (1) Heroes provide one perspective on the
individual, since heroes serve as exemplary individuals or models of conduct.
Gilgamesh is one of the first heroes in world literature. How does he exemplify
heroic behavior? (2) Other perspectives on the individual are provided by
consideration of those factors that shape our identities. Enkidu
first appears in Gilgamesh as a wild man, totally outside human society. How is
he socialized into human society? What role does his friendship with Gilgamesh
play in Enkidu’s socialization? (3) as Enkidu lies dying he bitterly complains that the temple
prostitute “Made me see things as a man, and a man sees death in things”(49).
To what extent is awareness of mortality a distinctive human train? (4) In
their adventures together, Gilgamesh and Enkidu
defeat the monster Humbaba. Exactly what is Humbaba? Do you think this figure, at least in some
respects, symbolizes some natural phenomenon? You may wish to reread the
descriptions of Humbaba on pages 29 and 38. (5) As
Gilgamesh and Enkidu approach Humbaba’s
forest, Gilgamesh is described as being “revitalized by danger”(35). To what
extent is a person’s individual development enhanced by confronting danger or
adversity? Are challenges and hardships essential to building character? (6)
The death of Enkidu drives Gilgamesh into a frenzy of
grief. To what extent do extreme pain or bereavement isolate or “desocialize” an individual? (7) Gilgamesh’s search for Utnapishtim and the secret of immortality is an early
example of the heroic quest. While there are possible elements of a real
journey in Gilgamesh’s quest, it is easy to see this quest as a symbolic
journey that brings Gilgamesh to a deeper understanding of human mortality.
Which elements of the journey seem to you to be the most realistic? Which
elements seem the most symbolic? Little is said in the text about Gilgamesh’s
behavior and actions after his return. How would you imagine him to have been
changed by this journey? (8) The story of Utnapishtim
is clearly similar to the biblical account of Noah and the Ark. What are the
similarities between the two stories? What important differences are there? (9)
What can you infer from Gilgamesh about the religious beliefs of the ancient
Mesopotamians? What attitudes to the Mesopotamian gods appear in the story?
See, for example, Utnapishtim’s comments to Gilgamesh
on pages 78-79. What beliefs, if any, about an afterlife seem to be implied in
the story?
SESSION FIVE—MONDAY, 11-14
Readings: The Sermon on the Mount, “Thây’s Fourteen
Precepts,” and Maimonides’ Eight Levels of Charity
(Seinfeld,
Friends,
Crash)
Focusing Questions: (1) The beatitudes (5:3-10) are considered a
proclamation of a new approach to the good life. Would Gilgamesh have accepted
these notions of goodness? Would he have rejected them all, accepted some? What
about Socrates? (2) Do you see any similarities between Socrates’s
attitude toward the gods and Jesus’ attitude toward God? (3) In these sayings
there is a heavy emphasis on heaven and hell. What value do you think this has
for the formation of a self? Is it necessary? Is it good? Is it harmful? (4)
There is also a strong emphasis on an interior goodness that goes beyond
outward good behavior. Is this important, valuable? or does it impose an
impossible ideal? (5) Similarly, what do you think of such well-known ideas as
turning the other cheek? loving your enemies? and so on. Do they have any
validity or are they unreal or even unjust notions? (6) Jesus’ insistence that
we not be anxious about food and clothing sounds like Socrates’s
insistence than men not be anxious about acquiring honors and possessions. In
what ways are they the same? different?
SESSION SIX—ONLINE, WEEK OF WEDNESDAY,
11-16
Readings: Atwood, The Handmaid’s
Tale
Focusing Questions: (1) The Handmaid’s Tale warns us that we
must address certain threats to our individuality in the present-day USA if we
are to avoid having to face them in a fully realized way in the future. Discuss
these threats to our individuality. (2) Aunt Lydia talks of two kinds of
freedom: “freedom to” and “freedom from,” and warns the handmaids not to
underrate “freedom from.” What does each kind of freedom mean? Give examples.
What does Lydia mean in warning not to underrate “freedom from?” (3) Offred tells the commander that what is missing from Gilead
is the opportunity to “fall in love.” Do you agree that this is the greatest
failure of Gilead? (4) Handmaids’ names are composed of “of,” followed by the
names of their commanders. In our own society, the majority of married women
adopt their husbands’ names. Discuss similarities and differences between the
two practices. (5) Do you agree with Professor Piexoto
that “our job is not to censure [practices in Gilead], but to understand
[them]”? (6) Is Offred a heroic individual? Why or
why not? (7) The Handmaid’s Tale presents us with a dystopia in which
individuality is largely crushed. Which one of all your freedoms today now
seems more precious as a result of reading The Handmaid’s Tale.
SESSION SEVEN—MONDAY, 11-21
ESSAY ONE DUE
Readings: Pico della
Mirandola, “Oration on the Dignity of Man”
Focusing Questions: (1) What is the importance for the individual human
person of having a particular place in the “Great Chain of Being,” that is, in
the immense natural world, from atoms to galaxies? (2) In what way does Pico de
la Mirandola’s understanding of human nature differ
from the duality we saw Gilgamesh between man as animal (Enkidu)
and man as God (Gilgamesh)? (3) In what way do human persons differ from the
rest of nature in Pico de la Mirandola? Is Pico’s a
legitimate way to define the relationship in today’s science-governed
understanding?
SESSION EIGHT—WEDNESDAY, 11-23 (No class,
Thanksgiving)
SESSION NINE—MONDAY, 11-28
MIDTERM EXAM
SESSION TEN—ONLINE, WEEK OF WEDNESDAY,
11-30
Readings:
Anne Fausto-Sterling,
The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough
Sharon Begley, Decoding the Human Body
Geoffrey Cowley and Anne Underwood, A Revolution in Medicine
Adam Bryant, The Gold Rush
Robert Sapolsky, It’s Not “All in the Genes”
Focusing Questions: (1) In “The Five Sexes,” Fausto-Sterling
states that experts estimate “as many as four percent of births” are intersex
or hermaphrodite babies who are neither male nor female, but some kind of true
or pseudo-hermaphrodite. What do you think and how do you feel, knowing that
one in 20 to 25 students attending class at FDU, about 400 of our roughly
10,000 students, are intersex, hermaphrodite, or transsexual persons? (2) How
might you react if you discovered that a member of your family, a close friend,
or a fellow student is a hermaphrodite or intersex? How might you react and
feel if you discovered that a parent, family member, close friend, or fellow
student was seriously planning to have a sex change operation? (3) Until
recently few questioned the “assumption that without medical care [and early
genital surgery to correct an intersex condition] hermaphrodites are doomed to
a life of misery.” Do you agree or disagree with this assumption, and why? (4) Fausto-Sterling concludes that the medical community is
finally recognizing the real harm and psychological damage its “biopower”—its ability to alter anatomical sex, and
surgically and hormonally force intersexual persons and hermaphrodites into
either male or female pigeonholes—has done to intersex and hermaphrodite
persons. How do you think people, and our society as a whole, will react now
that the gender experts, physicians, and psychologists are concluding that it is
better not to operate on or medically treat intersex and hermaphrodite babies
right after birth, and more humane and ethical to let them grow up as intersex
persons until they can make a decision about their own treatment? (5) Explain
why you agree or disagree with Fausto-Sterling’s
suggestion “that the three intersexes, herm, merm,
and ferm, deserve to be considered additional sexes
each in its own right.” Remember, she clearly suggests “that sex is a vast,
indefinitely malleable continuum that defies the constraints of even five
sexes.” Why are male and female not enough? Why are five sexes not enough? (6)
Intersexual and hermaphrodite persons, Fausto-Sterling
tells us, were recognized and discussed by Plato, early interpreters of the
Bible and the Genesis story of creation, and in the Jewish books of laws. Why
did this change at the end of the Middle Ages? Do you think new medical
knowledge about the biological origins of intersex, hermaphrodite, and
transsexual persons, and our new knowledge about the varieties and biological
causes of our sexual orientations will force us to again recognize this
diversity of human sexualities? Will we and our society be able to recognize
the equality and rights of all persons, whatever their sexual identity, role,
and/or orientation?
SESSION ELEVEN—MONDAY, 12-5
Readings: William Wordsworth, “Ode: Intimations of Immortality…”
and “Tintern Abbey”
Focusing Questions: (1) What does it means to say “the child is father
to the man”? Is it true? (2) Wordsworth’s natural world is much more intimate
and vivid than the abstract vision of the cosmos considered by Pico. In what
way does this modify the way we think of ourselves in relation to nature? (3)
Why is it the child’s relation to nature that is so important in “Tintern Abbey” and “Ode”? (4) For Wordsworth the outer self
is the social self. Why does he reject this outer self in favor of an inner,
private self? Is this same rejection found in any way in Gilgamesh or in
Plato’s “Apology” and “Crito”? (5) Why does
Wordsworth find the Socratic or Platonic ideal of reason inadequate for the
making of a self? Who would Wordsworth admire more, Socrates or Gilgamesh? (6)
Wordsworth suggests that we become prisoners as we grow older. Do we find this
experience reflected, for instance, in Gilgamesh or in Socrates? Do we find it
in our own experience? (7) Childhood, nature, and the folk are the sources from
which Wordsworth builds an inner self. How are they related?
SESSION TWELVE—ONLINE, WEEK OF WEDNESDAY,
12-7
Readings:
The Autobiography of Malcolm X (“Nightmare,” 1-22; “Detroit Red,” first half, 84-96;
“Satan,” last half, 162-168; “Saved,” last two-thirds, 178-190; “Savior,” first
10 pages, 191-199; “Minister Malcolm,” last half, 222-235; “Black Muslims,”
236-265; “Mecca,” 318-342; “El Hajj,” 343-363; “1965,” 364-382. Additional
passages–optional: “Ella’s Pride,” 32; “Be a Carpenter,” 36; “Hustler,”
114-117, include West Indian Archie; Section on Bimbi,
153; “Satan,” whole chapter; “Saved,” whole chapter; “Epilogue, 383-456; “On
Malcolm,” 457-460.)
Focusing Questions: (1) In what ways was Malcolm’s individuality denied
him because of his race? (2) Malcolm said his life was a series of changes.
What were the major changes in his life? How did the various names and
nicknames he had mark some of the changes. What was the difference between the
childhood of Malcolm X and the childhood that Wordsworth describes? (3) What
personal experiences made him open to accepting the teaching that “the white
man is the devil”? What reading in history? In what way did his hajj change his
attitude? (4) What message did Malcolm have for African-Americans? For white
Americans? Why did human rights become his central idea, and not just civil
rights? What were his final spiritual teachings? (5) Malcolm’s life can be seen
as a process of mental liberation, of “decolonizing the mind.” How did his
self-education contribute? How did his break with Elijah Muhammad? (6) What can
Malcolm tell us about the value of education? (7) What was his attitude toward
women in general, and in particular, towards Ella, his mother, Betty Shabbaz? What was his attitude toward Jews? Toward
violence? (8) What would you say about the claim that Malcolm found himself
through commitment to a higher cause? (9) How do racial and other group identifications
shape our sense of who we are?
SESSION THIRTEEN—MONDAY, 12-12
Readings: Tillie Olsen, “I Stand Here
Ironing”
Focusing Questions: (1) There are many sources of the pain which Emily
has experienced in her life. Who or what is mainly responsible for this pain?
(2) Does Emily have the freedom to overcome the difficulties of her early life?
What might Pico say? (3) “I Stand Here Ironing” has been called a work which
de-romanticizes motherhood. Is it? Why or why not?
SESSION FOURTEEN—ONLINE, WEEK OF WEDNESDAY,
12-14
Readings: Sigmund Freud, Civilization
and Its Discontents
Focusing Questions: (1) How does Freud differ from Wordsworth in his
explanation of the struggle between instinctual drives and the expectations of
civilization? Which one, do you think, better explains the tension? (2)
Wordsworth sees nature as a refuge from civilization. How does Freud see it?
(3) Does the struggle between civilization and instinct contribute to or
inhibit personal growth? (4) What is the difference between Freud’s notion of
law and that of Socrates? (5) How widespread is discontent in American
civilization? What are the principal sources of this discontent? Can technology
relieve us of these problems? What does Freud think? (6) What is the
relationship between Freud’s theories and the way the struggle between instinct
and culture has been managed in The Handmaid’s Tale?
SESSION FIFTEEN—MONDAY, 12-19
ESSAY TWO DUE
Readings: Elie Wiesel, Night
Focusing Questions: (1) In what way is the narrator’s early life in Sighet like the early life described by Wordsworth? Note
several elements of this early life which constitute the narrator’s
individuality. Show how each is taken away from him by his life in the camps.
(2) The relationship of Eliezer to his father is very
important in the second half of the book. Why? From this relationship, what
lesson does Eliezer learn about an individual’s
potential for good and evil? (3) Just prior to the Nazi invasion of Hungary,
the Jews of Sighet took comfort against rumors to the
effect that Hitler was harming European Jews by asking: “Was he going to wipe
out the whole people?. . . So many millions! . . . And in the middle of the
twentieth century!” The twentieth century individual, they thought, was
incapable of repeating the atrocities, the mass murders of the dim past. What
assumptions about the effect of Western culture on the “twentieth century”
individual are being made here? How have your ideas about “progress” been
affected by this text? (4) The Holocaust could not have occurred without the
active collaboration of many ordinary citizens and the silent compliance of
countless others. At the war crimes tribunal following World War II at
Nuremberg, many Nazi defendants pleaded the case that they were “just following
orders,” that actions taken against Jews were “legal.” Individual citizens in
our own society sometimes confront laws they find to be immoral. Give some
instances in recent United States history in which individuals have refused to
obey laws they condemn morally. Are there any laws which would prompt your
disobedience for ethical reasons? (5) This course begins with a dystopia.
Toward the close of the course we have now read a tale of a lived dystopia.
What similarities to Gilead do you find in the world described in Night. (6)
Imagine that Plato and Freud are alive and have just completed reading Wiesel’s
Night. Compose letters written by them to Wiesel telling him how their own
thoughts relate to the tragedy depicted in Night.
SESSION SIXTEEN—WEDNESDAY, 12-21
FINAL EXAMINATION
Neoclassical period of 18th
Century defined by:
Liberty
vs. Authority
Reason
vs. Intuition
Struggle
of the new machine age
Behavior
of the cosmos
Art,
science, and nature’s law
Reason
ruled supreme
Poetry
becoming emotionally barren
The romantic tendency of
poetry (1798-1832):
entered
into nature to express it and feel it
no
illusion of a perfect natural world
pain
and sorrow of life
individual
artistic tastes, human rights, and responsibilities
perception
love
and fear of nature
original
genius, genuine emotion, and the human spirit
WILLIAM WORDSWORTH
Two poetic tendencies of the
moral and the confessional
Communing with nature vs.
conformity to social convention
Integration of the natural
world and the divine spirit
Poetry written to instruct
and give pleasure.
Being aware of that special
gift entrusted to him, the gift of the poet’s imagination, he stated in the
Prelude:
Imagination—here
the Power so called
Through
sad incompetence of human speech,
That
awful Power rose from the mind’s abyss
Like
an unfathered vapor that enwraps,
At
once, some lonely traveler. I was lost;
Halted
without an effort to break through;
But
to my conscious soul I now can say—
“I
recognize thy glory.”
Influences:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Nature
French Revolution
Plato
Christianity and the Bible
In the Prelude (Book XIII,
lines 1010), he speaks of the hidden depth of power behind all poetry:
From
Nature doth emotion come, and moods
Of
calmness equally are Nature’s gift:
This
is her glory; these two attributes
Are
sister horns that constitute her strength.
Hence
Genius, born to thrive by interchange
Of
peace and excitation, finds in her
His
best and purest friend; from her receives
That
energy by which he seeks the truth,
From
her that happy stillness of the mind
Which
fits him to receive it when unsought.
“Poetry is the
spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings”
Moshe ben Maimon
(1135-1204) was a Jewish rabbi, physician and philosopher. He is most commonly
known by his Greek name, Moses Maimonides (or more formally Rabbi Moses ben Maimonides), and subsequently many Jewish works refer
to him by the acronym of his title and name, RaMBaM
or Rambam.
According to Rambam, there are eight levels of charity, each greater
than the next.
[1] The greatest level is to
support a fellow in order to strengthen his hand until he need no longer
be dependent upon others.
[2] A lesser level of charity
is to give to the poor without knowing to whom one gives, and without the
recipient knowing from whom he received.
[3] A lesser level of charity
is when one knows to whom one gives, but the recipient does not know his
benefactor.
[4] A lesser level of charity
is when one does not know to whom one gives, but the poor person does know his
benefactor.
[5] A lesser level of charity
is when one gives to the poor person directly into his hand, but gives before
being asked.
[6] A lesser level of charity
is when one gives to the poor person after being asked.
[7] A lesser level of charity
is when one gives inadequately, but gives gladly and with a smile.
[8] A lesser level of charity
is when one gives unwillingly.
Jan 30, 1933 – Hitler
appointed Chancellor of Germany, a nation with a Jewish population of
566,000.
In July - Nazis pass law
allowing for forced sterilization of those found by a Hereditary Health
Court to have genetic defects.
In Jan - Jews are banned from
many professional occupations including teaching Germans, and from being
accountants, physicians, lawyers, or dentists. They are also denied tax
reductions and child allowances.
In July - At Evian
Conference, France, the U.S. convenes a League of Nations conference with
delegates from 32 countries to consider helping Jews fleeing Hitler, but
results in inaction as no country will accept them.
Nov 9/10 - Kristallnacht - The Night of Broken Glass. In all
101 synagogues and 7,500 Jewish businesses were destroyed. 26,000 Jews were
arrested and sent to concentration camps, Jews were physically attacked and
beaten and 91 died. Nazis fine Jews one billion marks for
damages related to Kristallnacht.
In May - The SS St. Louis,
a ship crowded with 930 Jewish refugees, is turned away by Cuba, the United
States and other countries and returns to Europe.
In Oct - Nazis begin T-4
Program (euthanasia) on sick and disabled in Germany.
In July - Eichmann’s Madagascar
Plan presented, proposing to deport all European Jews to the island of
Madagascar, off the coast of east Africa.
In March - In occupied
Poland, Belzec extermination camp
becomes operational. The camp is fitted with permanent gas chambers using
carbon monoxide piped in from engines placed outside the chamber, but will
later substitute Zyklon-B.
In May - In occupied Poland, Sobibor extermination camp becomes
operational. The camp is fitted with three gas chambers using carbon monoxide
piped in from engines, but will later substitute Zyklon-B.
In 1943 - The number of Jews
killed by SS Einsatzgruppen passes one million. Nazis
then use special units of slave laborers Sonderkommando
to dig up and burn the bodies to remove all traces.
April 19-30 - The Bermuda
Conference occurs as representatives from the U.S. and Britain discuss the
problem of refugees from Nazi-occupied countries, but results in inaction
concerning the plight of the Jews.
In May - SS Dr. Josef Mengele arrives at Auschwitz and institutes process of
selection.
In Oct - The Danish
Underground helps transport 7,220 Danish Jews to safety in Sweden by sea.
In June - A Red Cross
delegation visits Theresienstadt after the Nazis have
carefully prepared the camp and the Jewish inmates, resulting in a favorable
report.
In July - Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg arrives in Budapest,
Hungary, and proceeds to save nearly 33,000 Jews by issuing diplomatic papers
and establishing ‘safe houses.’
NAME____________________________________
Altruism: the principle or practice of unselfish
concern for or devotion to the welfare of others.
Seinfeld, “The Calzone” (1996)
“If
they don’t notice it, what’s the point?”
Question: On Maimonides 8 Levels of Charity, where
would George, his actions, and his motivations fall? Where in your life have
displayed three different levels of charity according to Maimonides?
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Friends, “The One Where Phoebe Hates PBS” (1998)
“It
made you feel good, so that makes it selfish.”
Questions: Is there such a thing as a “selfless good
deed?” Can anything be done which achieves a good end but brings no sense of
satisfaction to the doer? What experiences from your life bring you to your
conclusions?
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Crash (2004)
“He
came home. Did you know that? . . . my little boy . . . when I was sleeping.
He
brought me groceries . . . last thing he did.”
Don Cheadle’s brother has been acting in ways that are a danger
to himself and others. His mother is suffering from depression and dementia,
and she clearly cannot care for herself, so we see Cheadle
bringing her food and other necessities. When the brother is found dead and the
body has to be identified, the mother finally breaks down and turns her anger
toward the surviving son, Cheadle, claiming that his
other interests within his personal and police business have kept him from
caring about what is important. “We weren’t much good to you anymore,” she
tells him. She offers the final comments quoted above to her only surviving son
before pushing him away.
Questions: Interpret Cheadle’s facial expressions, eye contact, gestures and/or any other affective details which would imply what might be going through his mind after listening to his mother’s criticism of his “lack of care for the family,” and then upon hearing his mother’s favorable (though untrue) comments about his dead brother. Describe this degree of benevolence, and relate it to something you have experienced in your life.
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________